Mayo Clinic researchers examined a decade of studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine. Considered one of the highest impact medical journals in the world. They found that:

“… the proportion of medical reversals [is] alarmingly high. At a minimum, it poses major questions about the validity and clinical utility of a sizeable portion of everyday medical care.”

In particular, over 40% of examined procedures were reversed, meaning they were either doing more harm than good or that there were safer, less costly and more effective options available.

What this means is that we should understand and critically examine all current medical procedures. If our doctor recommends a procedure it is often because it is the standard of care. However, this study shows us that the standard of care may do more harm than good almost half of the time.

To make matters worse, doctors essentially have to prescribe the standard of care even if they don’t believe in it. If they don’t, they risk being sued for malpractice. This puts the onus on patients to become informed and decide for themselves. This is particularly true of invasive and potentially dangerous procedures.

Of course, this also illustrates a strength of Chinese medicine. It has literally thousands of years of weeding out treatments that are ineffective. The Mayo Clinic review reminds us that our worship of randomized controlled trials is misplaced and that we need to look for more reliable methods to test and/or to approve medical procedures.

Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Volume 88, Issue 8, Pages 790-798, August 2013